Surveillance, Privacy, and Protection

Exploring the challenges of parental monitoring app misuse, highlighting OSINT's role in combating technology-facilitated abuse.

The Hidden Threat of Parental Control Applications

Parental control applications, such as mSpy, FlexiSPY, and Spyzie, were designed to protect children by enabling features like location tracking, keystroke logging, and message monitoring. However, these functionalities are often exploited for coercive control in intimate relationships, undermining trust and autonomy. Developers, driven by profit, frequently fail to incorporate robust consent mechanisms and ethical safeguards (Freed et al., 2020).

Research by Chatterjee et al. (2018) highlights the widespread misuse of spyware-like applications. Victims are often unaware of being monitored, which compounds their vulnerability. A 2024 Sky News investigation revealed how a woman’s partner secretly installed Life360 to track her movements, limiting her autonomy and interactions. This lack of transparency underscores the urgent need for developer accountability and ethical oversight.

Legal and Ethical Dimensions

Under Article 8 of the ECHR, unauthorised surveillance breaches the right to privacy and family life. In Barbulescu v. Romania (2017), the European Court of Human Rights ruled that disproportionate monitoring violates these rights. Despite this precedent, existing legal frameworks inadequately address the misuse of parental control apps, leaving victims with limited protection.

Technology-facilitated abuse also erodes dignity and respect in relationships. Scholars such as Dragiewicz et al. (2018) argue that such misuse normalises surveillance culture, perpetuating cycles of control and psychological harm. Brookfield et al. (2023) emphasise that long-term trauma is a frequent consequence of this abuse, further highlighting the need for legal and societal intervention.

The Role of OSINT in Investigative Strategies

OSINT and digital forensics are critical tools for law enforcement and intelligence agencies combating app misuse. These methodologies support investigations in the following ways:

Pattern Recognition and Abuse Identification: OSINT techniques, including metadata analysis and cross-referencing app usage data, help detect systematic abuse. Social media research and app review analysis can uncover patterns of misuse and identify perpetrators.
Tracing App Deployment: Network traffic analysis allows investigators to identify unauthorised app installations. Collaborating with developers and platforms can provide access to user logs and activity data to substantiate abuse allegations.
Evidence Compilation for Legal Action: OSINT and digital forensics provide robust evidence for legal proceedings. For example, retrieving GPS logs or keystroke records from victim devices can demonstrate coercive control, meeting evidentiary standards for court admissibility.
Victim Support and Education: Digital forensic tools can help victims identify and remove spyware from their devices, restoring autonomy and rebuilding trust in law enforcement.
Proactive Threat Research: By analysing online forums, dark web marketplaces, and user communities, OSINT enables proactive identification of emerging risks and new methods of surveillance abuse.

Balancing OSINT and Legal Frameworks

While OSINT offers significant advantages, its application must align with privacy laws and human rights. The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) emphasises lawful and transparent data processing. Investigators must balance surveillance with the rights enshrined in Article 8 of the ECHR, ensuring proportionality and ethical adherence.

Enhanced legislation is essential. The UK’s Investigatory Powers Act 2016 provides a framework for government surveillance but lacks specificity regarding misuse in intimate relationships. Policymakers must introduce targeted laws criminalising unauthorised app deployment, with penalties for developers complicit in misuse.

Case Studies: Real-World Impacts

The misuse of parental control apps has devastating effects on victims. Brookfield et al. (2023) document cases of severe isolation, anxiety, and long-term psychological harm stemming from covert surveillance. In one case, a victim’s daily movements were tracked via GPS, enabling an abuser to restrict their freedom. Such examples highlight the urgent need for legislative and societal intervention.

Recommendations for Comprehensive Action

Strengthening Legal Protections: Introduce laws requiring mandatory consent features and penalising misuse. Developers must implement safeguards that prioritise user privacy.
Advancing OSINT Training: Equip law enforcement with advanced OSINT and digital forensic skills to combat technology-facilitated abuse effectively.
Promoting Public Awareness: Launch campaigns to educate individuals about the risks of parental control apps and empower them to secure their digital privacy.
Enforcing Corporate Accountability: Impose stringent compliance requirements on developers, including ethical app design and transparency.
Building Victim Support Systems: Provide accessible legal aid and counselling resources for survivors of technology-facilitated abuse.
Strengthening International Collaboration: Foster cross-border cooperation to address the misuse of parental control applications, as these issues often transcend national jurisdictions (Amnesty International, 2022).
Ethical Technology Design: Developers should embed advanced security features and ethical safeguards to deter unauthorised use while adhering to international standards (Cory & Meyer, 2023).
Addressing Power Dynamics: Integrate gender-sensitive policies into the development and regulation of surveillance tools to counteract societal power imbalances (Watkins & Lewis, 2023).

Conclusion

The misuse of parental control applications for intimate partner surveillance poses significant challenges to privacy, autonomy, and human dignity. Integrating OSINT with robust legal frameworks and ethical app development practices is essential to mitigating these risks. Upholding Article 8 of the ECHR and advancing legislation tailored to address technological abuse are critical steps toward restoring trust and equity in relationships.

Collective action from governments, developers, and individuals is essential to creating a digital ecosystem that respects human rights and safeguards against abuse. By taking these steps, we can ensure that technology serves its intended purpose: enhancing safety and promoting well-being.

References

Amnesty International (2022) 'Digital Surveillance and Human Rights', Amnesty International Reports. Available at: https://www.amnesty.org

Brookfield, K., Fyson, R., and Goulden, M. (2023) 'Technology-Facilitated Domestic Abuse: An under-Recognised Safeguarding Issue?', The British Journal of Social Work, 54(1), pp. 419–436. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcad206

Chatterjee, R., Doerfler, P., Orgad, H., Havron, S., Palmer, J., Freed, D., Levy, K., Dell, N., McCoy, D., and Ristenpart, T. (2018) 'The spyware used in intimate partner violence', Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy. Available at: https://nixdell.com/papers/spyware.pdf

Council of Europe (n.d.) Guide on Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Available at: https://ks.echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr-ks/guide_art_8_eng-pdf

Cory, K. & Meyer, P. (2023) 'Ethical Technology in Surveillance Tools', Journal of Ethics in Technology, 12(4), pp. 45–62.

Dragiewicz, M., Burgess, J., Matamoros-Fernandez, A., and Salter, M. (2018) 'Technology-Facilitated Coercive Control', Feminist Media Studies, 18(4), pp. 609–625.

Freed, D., Palmer, J., Minchala, D.E., Levy, K., Ristenpart, T., and Dell, N. (2020) 'Privacy threats in intimate relationships', Journal of Cybersecurity, 6(1). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/cybsec/tyaa006

Sky News (2024) 'I thought I’d been microchipped': How abusers spy on partners with parental control apps. Available at: https://news.sky.com/story/i-thought-id-been-microchipped-how-abusers-spy-on-partners-with-parental-control-apps-13272199

Watkins, R. & Lewis, T. (2023) 'Surveillance, Power, and Gender: Redefining Boundaries in Digital Tools', Gender and Society Journal, 29(3), pp. 77–91.

Wright, P. (2022) 'Emerging Technologies in Intimate Partner Violence Investigations', Journal of Law and Technology, 39(1), pp. 55–72.

European Court of Human Rights (2017) Barbulescu v. Romania, Application No. 61496/08. Available at: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int

‍

A great opportunity to talk about OSINT and meet professionals from different areas of the field